To: antiRepublicrat
And where's the admin for the hundreds of millions of home installs? Is everyone supposed to become a computer expert just to be relatively secure?
Tell it to Red Hat. Or Suse. Or Mandrake. Because they ship exactly the same way.
And for business, do you mind paying for the extra admin work to make up for the shortcomings of the OS and its initial configuration? I'd prefer to save the money.
Considering that you would need to add user accounts anyway -- and differentiating those user accounts as restricted is TRIVIAL -- I'd go with the OS that the vast majority of the world uses. Not some untested wallflower OS from pansyland California...
To: Bush2000
some untested wallflower OS from pansyland California... I don't have a dog in the current discussion, but that's funny. Mind if I steal it sometime?
264 posted on
01/30/2005 7:06:56 PM PST by
Richard Kimball
(We sleep soundly in our beds because rough men are ready to do violence on our behalf)
To: Bush2000
I'd go with the OS that the vast majority of the world uses. Not some untested wallflower OS from pansyland California... You mean the one that by default doesn't even enable the root account (= "Administrator" in Winodws)?
Untested? Dude, the core of that "untested" OS is the extremely tested BSD, which has been working in a networked environment since before Bill's OS even realized you could hook two computers together.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson