[GoldenOrchid]

Bluest Companies



Aloha Air Group, Inc. 100%
Borders Group, Inc. 100%
Diamond Resorts International 100%
Foot Locker, Inc 100%
Google Inc. 100%
Hawaiian Holdings, Inc. 100%
Loews Hotels Holding Corporation 100%
Powell's Books, Inc. 100%
Progressive Corporation 100%
Starbucks Corporation 100%
Trader Joe's Company, Inc. 100%
Whole Foods Market, Inc. 100%
Costco Wholesale Corporation 99%
Bed, Bath & Beyond Inc 97%
Hyatt Hotels and Resorts 93%
Hilton Hotels Corporation 84%
JetBlue Airways Corporation 75%
Netflix, Inc 72%
Brown-Forman Corporation 57%
Yahoo! Inc. 47%
Alaska Air Group, Inc. 45%

---

Reddest Companies

---

Cintas Corporation 100%
Dollar General Corporation 100%
Fruit of the Loom 100%
Lowe's Companies, Inc. 100%
Outback Steakhouse, Inc. 92%
CBRL Group, Inc. 84%
Darden Restaurants, Inc. 79%
Hallmark Cards, Inc. 14%
Adolph Coors Company 16%
Brinker International, Inc. 16%
Marriott International, Inc. 17%
Shell Oil Company 17%
YUM! Brands, Inc. 21%
InterContinental Hotels Group PLC 25%
Guess?, Inc 27%
Amazon.com, Inc. 41%

[KoRn]

Enjoy a Bloomin' Onion at Outback. (I've never cared for their steaks)

[beckysueb]

Walmart, Kmart and Target contributed heavily Republican, too. Starbucks to the Dems? Who would have ever guessed!

[NonValueAdded]

This could get a little complicated ... for example, Aloha Air Group, Inc. is listed as 100% but only because of contributions to the reelection fund for Sen. Inouye - nothing for Kerry! Quite frankly, a Hawaiian company would be fools to not contribute to the very senior senator. It's the Kerry contribution or non-local RAT (such as Daschle) that would be the requirement to make my buy-red list.

Also, one must be careful to separate the actions of headquarter types from the rest of the company. As long as the liberal slant doesn't translate into corporate action - such as Target's choice of charitable contributions, for example - then you might find yourself targeting a company with a blue hq but with lots of red state operations.

I wonder what recourse companies have against sites that erroneously target them?