Replies

No. Just no time for you to speak intelligently (I'll pass on the obvious jab) on those actions.

Quote: "Since you obviously have no personal knowledge about the man, any knock on your part would be seen as knee-jerk acceptance of anything negative you read about him."

This is one of the most stupid remarks (I'll pass on the obvious jab) I have seen in a long time

What you are saying is we have no right to criticize (knock) any person we don't know personally. Think about it.

Here's a knee-jerk criticism I made more than three years ago. I no longer have that right?

Who, in the Vatican, is more conservative than Ratzinger???

Would this person have a vested interest in Ordinatio Sacerdotalis being declared "infallible"? You bet he does.

Now, he has the "approval" of JP II but no proof of this approval. What a shock. What a suprise.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This is one of the most stupid remarks (I'll pass on the obvious jab) I have seen in a long time

What you are saying is we have no right to criticize (knock) any person we don't know personally. Think about it.

No.. that's NOT "what I'm saying". "Having personal knowledge" is not the same thing as "knowing a person personally". In all your years, the English language is still a trial for you, eh?

Here's a knee-jerk criticism I made more than three years ago. I no longer have that right?

Of course you have "the right" - though you are usually (and in this case certainly) wrong.

Who, in the Vatican, is more conservative than Ratzinger???

Likely quite a few. None that you would have ever heard of though.

Would this person have a vested interest in Ordinatio Sacerdotalis being declared "infallible"? You bet he does.

??? What's the point?

Now, he has the "approval" of JP II but no proof of this approval. What a shock. What a suprise.

See? Open your ~~mouth~~ post in ignorance and this is what you get. You think they don't know whether JPII approved of Ratzinger or not?