Skip to comments.
The Neverending Story
Free Republic
| 3/24/01
| The NES Crew
Posted on 01/11/2005 6:18:33 PM PST by malakhi
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 841-860, 861-880, 881-900 ... 3,961-3,963 next last
To: PayNoAttentionManBehindCurtain; JHavard
861
posted on
01/19/2005 12:46:30 PM PST
by
malakhi
To: malakhi
Anyone hear from JHavard recently? :o)Wow. Might be a good chance for him to try out that "sleep" theology that's so near and dear to his heart. :-)
To: malakhi
Am I doing something wrong? I've noticed that when I ping more than one person in the ping line lately it only takes one.
To: Invincibly Ignorant
What are you using to separate names? Try a semi-colon:
Invincibly Ignorant; malakhi
864
posted on
01/19/2005 12:59:21 PM PST
by
malakhi
To: malakhi
I've been using a comma. Done that for years.
To: malakhi
by the way check this out
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-religion/1323573/posts
To: Invincibly Ignorant; malakhi
Am I doing something wrong?
:)
BigMack
To: Invincibly Ignorant
868
posted on
01/19/2005 1:09:05 PM PST
by
malakhi
To: PayNoAttentionManBehindCurtain
Whatever your image was, it didn't display for me.
869
posted on
01/19/2005 1:10:58 PM PST
by
malakhi
To: PayNoAttentionManBehindCurtain
To: malakhi
Whatever your image was, it didn't display for me.Trust me, you didn't miss much. :-)
To: Invincibly Ignorant
Where? Here -------> Invincibly Ignorant
BigMack
To: PayNoAttentionManBehindCurtain
Here -------> Invincibly IgnorantInvincibly Ignorant; Invincible Dumbass, whats the diff? :-)
To: OLD REGGIE
Spanish Catholic Church denies it accepts condoms to fight AIDSThe Spanish Roman Catholic Church denied that it had condoned the use of condoms as a legitimate way of fighting HIV/AIDS.
"Contrary to what some have said, it is not true that the Church has changed its position on condoms," the Spanish bishops' conference said in a statement.
The text reasserted that, according to Catholic doctrine, "the use of a condom implies immoral sexual behaviour.
That was quick.
SD
To: SoothingDave
That was quickYa think? I knew there would be a response before there was a story. :-)
To: SoothingDave
So, they were for condoms before they were against them, or something? I'm confused. Was the early story falsely reported, or did someone do a quick back-pedal?
876
posted on
01/19/2005 1:50:59 PM PST
by
malakhi
To: malakhi; PayNoAttentionManBehindCurtain; Invincibly Ignorant
Whatever your image was, it didn't display for me. He called II a "Dumbass".
877
posted on
01/19/2005 1:59:50 PM PST
by
OLD REGGIE
(I am most likely a Biblical Unitarian?)
To: SoothingDave
That was quick.
Now I'm confused. Isn't everything we see in print the truth?
878
posted on
01/19/2005 2:03:13 PM PST
by
OLD REGGIE
(I am most likely a Biblical Unitarian?)
To: OLD REGGIE
Now I'm confused. Isn't everything we see in print the truth? Everything except those ads in the paper offering "Patriots Super Bowl Packages." ;-)
SD
To: SoothingDave
880
posted on
01/19/2005 2:10:08 PM PST
by
malakhi
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 841-860, 861-880, 881-900 ... 3,961-3,963 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson