That's an odd line of reasoning. Given that USC is #1 and Auburn is #2, there are no other teams in Division I-A football that are stronger. I would say that Cal is the equal to any of the SEC teams listed behind Auburn.
But how does that effect the strength of USC, or are you trying to compare conferences? if so, you have to look at the bottom teams as wellas the top teams. That what Sagarin does with his performance-based ranking.
"Alabama alone has more National Titles than the entire PAC 10. LOL!"
You have blown your credibility. Name your college football "National titles" for Alabama. Cite year and poll (i.e A.P., U.P.I., CNN/USA Today).
Try 12. Here is a link. Pictures are included. LOL!
http://www.rolltide.com/Football/4751.asp
Like I said you can't answer a simple question. You just keep dancing around the question, and trying to convert it to a question you would prefer to answer. You know I am right, and this is why you cannot answer the question.