Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: mysto
Just because the 3rd film doesn't have "Dollars" in its name doesn't mean it wasn't part of the trilogy.

It was indeed part of the Leone/Eastood trilogy; it just wasn't one of the two "Dollars" movies.

186 posted on 12/30/2004 1:23:04 PM PST by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies ]


To: Mr. Mojo
It was indeed part of the Leone/Eastood trilogy
The trilogy is what is unofficially referred to by fans as the "Dollars trilogy." All 3 movies are considered to be part of the same series of spaghetti westerns. If you don't believe me, Google search "dollars trilogy" and see how many hits you get.
(geez, why are we arguing about this? This is like Clinton trying to argue what the meaning of "is" is...)
187 posted on 12/30/2004 1:32:26 PM PST by mysto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson