Pamela Anderson Naked on Values

WMCA - New York ^ | 12.17.2004

[KMC1]

BARE NAKED TRUTH: According to the Associated Press former Baywatch star Pamela Anderson came to the "controversial" decision to bare it all for some upcoming Chinese billboards on behalf of PETA's "fur is dead" campaign.

The only thing intriguing about the story is Pamela's quote:

"I'm perfectly happy to bare my skin if it will help save animals' skins," Anderson said.

(photo cropped for decency)

I find it interesting that she will only do this "for a good cause".

It is hypocritical on two levels... 1) Since when has Anderson ever needed a good cause to remove her clothing? But secondly and much more importantly 2) How does she define good causes?

Animal skins are worth shredding your dignity and decency for - but the lives of children aren't? The slaughter of animals (who are not eternal beings - and have no souls) has taken a higher MORAL value in our culture than the lives of our fellow human beings.

Abortion on demand, partial birth abortion, and the less well known - born alive abortion - have taken the lives of nearly two generations of PEOPLE yet we have not seen the cry of one major figure from the "pretty people class" (with perhaps exception to Mel Gibson) that have been willing to do something "shocking" to save HUMANS...SAD! ...very, very, sad...

[gop_gene]

Pam Anderson isn't all that, really. She's below average without makeup and is not aging well--without makeup she looks older than her actual age which I think is mid-30s.

She is way overrated in my book, just having (bleached) blond hair and (silicon) boobs does not a great beauty make. Pretty, but in a "plasticky," dime-a-dozen, generic fashion.

[F16Fighter]

"The first word that comes to mind is 'used'"

I'd prefer to think of Miss Anderson as "pre-owned." ;-)

[Reuben Hick]

The lower animals do not have souls. Higher animals such as dogs, cats, horses DO have souls

Really?  And by what biblical criteria do we have sorting out the "lower animals" from the "higher animals"?
I mean, I have heard of the distinction between "clean" and "unclean", and being associated with "the dogs" is considered to be the lowest of the low...

Despite this indignant rant it would help if the ranter had SOME Biblical knowledge when making such comparisons.

And a good rant that you have going here too.  So what is that "Biblical knowledge" concerning "lower animals" and "higher animals".
Did Jesus die for Kitty-Kat too?

 

[Melas]

37 is middle aged now? What are you? 19?