Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: pikachu
They were a little upset when I pointed out to them that "The North" was not the Union states but Canada.

What's to be upset about? The end had to be in Canada since the Fugitive Slave Act required that runaway slaves be sent back South if apprehended.

They also didn't like the fact that the first slaves sold in the Colonies were in Massachusetts.

If they check their history they would have found that the first slave was in the Virginia/Maryland area.

Nor did they like to remmeber that the triangle trade that made Boston very rich included bringing molasses to Boston to be made into rum which was taken to Africa to be traded for slaves.

Without demand for those slaves the Boston traders wouldn't have brought the slaves anywhere, would they? So the south has no moral high ground in the slave trade scenario.

8 posted on 12/16/2004 7:06:48 AM PST by Non-Sequitur (Jefferson Davis - the first 'selected, not elected' president.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: Non-Sequitur
So the south has no moral high ground in the slave trade scenario.

No, we don't. But the Northern states don't either. Both sets of states had businessmen that grew rich off the slave trade, directly or indirectly.

}:-)4

11 posted on 12/16/2004 7:11:37 AM PST by Moose4 ("Frrrrrrrrrp." --Livingston the Viking Kitty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson