Replies

We may never know everything about what happened on 9/11/2001.

However, it has been shown time and time again how out of control the intelligence machine that Bush inherited from Clinton was.

This story has the fingerprint that has surfaced in other incidences since 9/11; leaks for political gain seem to be in the forefront.

While there are points in this story that invite skepticism, to ignore the possibility for some element of truth shows a severe lack of an ability to be open minded, pragmatic or intellectually honest.

This guy may be the Antichrist; but the Federal Agents telling him to keep his mouth shut angle should be familiar to anyone following the news from any activity that the Clinton-Era Intelligence community had anything to do with.

OKC Bombing, Waco, Ruby Ridge, WTC Bombing (1993) and now 9/11. Look back in the news and archives. You will see that this is a recurring concept.

The only thing that certain is that the "tin foil hat" naysayers will be out in numbers trying to convince the rest of the readers to not give the story any credence at all.

And we; both myself and the naysayers condemn the main stream press as biased.

Charity begins at home.