[The Spirit Of Allegiance]

This isn't 'evolution' at all--it's patently pro-evolution lies put forth as 'science.' Bigheaded snakes can eat big poisonous things and die. Smaller specimens of the same species then survive--the 'fittest' paradoxically being the smallest and presumably weakest...although presumably also the toads are smaller when young and could be swallowed by smaller snakes. (Read "The Andromeda Strain" ...) Breeders have made miniature horses, miniature pinschers, poodles etc. by similar selective breeding. You show me a snake that can type Othello or sing Sorrento--or a dolphin that's built an underwater hospital--and I'll give a little credence to the hypothesis of evolution.

[ApesForEvolution]

LOL

I just have to laugh at the Evotards...sorry...BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAA!

[merzbow]

You are clueless, Blurblogger. THIS IS EVOLUTION. Members of a species are being handed a reproductive advantage for having certain hereditary characteristics. THAT IS HOW EVOLUTION WORKS. It's anti-scientific nonsense like your post that gives a bad name to Christian conservatism in this country.

[contemplator]

Your explanation sounds like 'survival of the fittest'. How is it different?