Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: inquest
I don't want to revisit the legal issues on that case for at least the tenth time on this forum. It's been done, and you can archive search it if you'd like.

Suffice it to say that Gonzales was the person in the Bush Administration who vetted all his judicial nominees in his first term, and Priscilla Owen was one that he approved.

She's currently one of the ten being filibustered. If Gonzales is pro-abortion, why has he not allowed one that I know of to be appointed?

47 posted on 12/08/2004 5:53:14 PM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]


To: Dog Gone
I don't want to revisit the legal issues on that case for at least the tenth time on this forum.

Whether you agree with the majority ruling in that case or not, you can't claim that they were "strictly construing" the statute under examination.

Suffice it to say that Gonzales was the person in the Bush Administration who vetted all his judicial nominees in his first term, and Priscilla Owen was one that he approved.

Bush and Gonzales knew his nominees would be filibustered. Why else did Bush not lift a finger to get his nominees approved? He never made it an issue with the Dems. Those nominations were all for show, to get conservatives to support him.

48 posted on 12/09/2004 9:28:31 AM PST by inquest (Now is the time to remove the leftist influence from the GOP. "Unity" can wait.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson