Why should you assume that because a freeper disagrees with you, they must be ignorant of the facts? Most evidence I've seen on FR is the opposite - I knew both of those facts, for example - I happen to disagree with you regarding his abortion decision, I think it was a fairly narrow decision around the law in Texas at the time and does not give a good indication of his views on abortion. I knew he was a member of La Raza - but I don't know enough about what that group was like then versus what it is now, just as the NAACP used to be somewhat respectable but now is a con game.
I'm not assuming that on that basis.