To: Nov3
I cannot speak to the Vitamin D angle, but the birth-date relationship seems to me like a spurious correlation. I'm sure that you could plot the data on an astrological chart and find that one sign or another is accorded a some sort of influence.
I was first diagnosed with MS in 1979; the progressive-remitting variety. I have reached the wheelchair stage. Still alive, though. Sure beats the alternative.
12 posted on
12/07/2004 9:42:45 AM PST by
Nicholas Conradin
(If you are not disquieted by "One nation under God," try "One nation under Allah.")
To: Nicholas Conradin
Vitamin D is actually misnamed. It is more like a hormone. The thought that Vitamin D levels during pregnancy could affect the neurological makeup of the child is not that far a grasp.Vitamin D levels vary in a fairly predictable pattern but there are individual exceptions. A large portion of the population is deficient year round.
Now I think there are a variety of factors for this cruel disease but I would look at the people who have claimed positive results with D supplementation. My sister has seen some positive results.
14 posted on
12/07/2004 10:59:18 AM PST by
Nov3
("This is the best election night in history." --DNC chair Terry McAuliffe Nov. 2,2004 8p.m.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson