Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Nov3
I cannot speak to the Vitamin D angle, but the birth-date relationship seems to me like a spurious correlation. I'm sure that you could plot the data on an astrological chart and find that one sign or another is accorded a some sort of influence.

I was first diagnosed with MS in 1979; the progressive-remitting variety. I have reached the wheelchair stage. Still alive, though. Sure beats the alternative.

12 posted on 12/07/2004 9:42:45 AM PST by Nicholas Conradin (If you are not disquieted by "One nation under God," try "One nation under Allah.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Nicholas Conradin
Vitamin D is actually misnamed. It is more like a hormone. The thought that Vitamin D levels during pregnancy could affect the neurological makeup of the child is not that far a grasp.Vitamin D levels vary in a fairly predictable pattern but there are individual exceptions. A large portion of the population is deficient year round.

Now I think there are a variety of factors for this cruel disease but I would look at the people who have claimed positive results with D supplementation. My sister has seen some positive results.

14 posted on 12/07/2004 10:59:18 AM PST by Nov3 ("This is the best election night in history." --DNC chair Terry McAuliffe Nov. 2,2004 8p.m.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson