[Truth666]

How the censors were fooled

How comes that what was supposed to be one more computer generated film to "produce" evidence for evolution theory turned in fact to be the most successful attempt to fool the censors responsible for keeping the public ignorant about the facts exposing immediately the bog lie evolution theory ?
Probably the censors were fooled by how straight forwars was the planned goal of the film - keeping repeating the basic lie for evolution, sugesting that it happened for "millions of years".
Since the film makers just kept repeating what they were supposed to ("let's take a journey millions of years to the past"), the censors just weren't able to realise that in fact the film makers were providing more clues to help the brain washed public understand the truth.
For example in the case of the Sahara crocodiles they showed Sahara wall paintings ("5,000 years old") portraying the animals that lived in the Sahara, while immediately after using the "millions of years" magic words ...

[bpcons]

huh?

[satchmodog9]

ok

[elbucko]

If you keep trying to expose the fraud of evolution, you're only going to make the Devil mad.

[John Valentine]

Doh! I suppose that for some these facts must be absolutely mindboggling.

But only to the uneducated would these facts appear to contradict evolution. In fact they support it 100%, so whoever you are, you should blow off so hard.

[don'tbedenied]

I say we take the flat earthers from here and the DUmmies and give 'em their own site. We can call it Tin Foil Underground Republic.

[Dog Gone]

Hate to break this to you, but land masses shift, mountains are born, seas rise and fall.

It's not really breaking news that we find giant seashell fossils in the middle of west Texas, for example.

[Whitehawk]

Convinced me! Now I'm gonna put on my aluminum foil hat so the aliens can't read my mind.

[dangus]

I don't get it... How do Ammonite fossils in the Himilayans disprove evolution? Surely, you do realize that when the Amonites were plentiful, according to scientists, the Himilayan mountains did not exist yet. That was about 500 million years ago. Much more recently (I forget exactly when), India supposedly crashed into Asia, resulting in the relatively brand-new mountain range rising up, lifting sedimentary rocks formed on the ocean floor to heights over 25000 feet.

On the other hand, I'm not sure how biblical literalists explain fossilized sea creatures 29,000 feet up.

Oh, and you do realize that the Sahara was recently quite moist, don't you?

[avant_garde]

What??? You mean my ancestors weren't hanging from the trees? Ohhhh, the humanity! Are we seeing idiocy as its evolving???

[Irish_Thatcherite]

Um.... an Irish woman discovered them crocs.

[Fatalis]

For example in the case of the Sahara crocodiles they showed Sahara wall paintings ("5,000 years old") portraying the animals that lived in the Sahara, while immediately after using the "millions of years" magic words ..

The Sahara desert as we know it is only a few thousand years old. What's your point?

[Truth666]

to people who write : sea-fossils found where they oughtn't be can easily be explained by plate tectonics. Mountains are the results of two plates pushing up against each other, so the ground is going to raise up.
Since the formation of mountains takes an exceedingly long time ... I win. Do I get a cookie?
No you don't. Of course the film had to keep repeating the "plate tectonics" explanation - that's what the film makers were paid for, and that's why (as I explained before) the key points of the film were not censored. But ...