Replies

You seem to forget your hypothesis is based upon missing evidence. Since I don't offer the Bible as scientific evidence, your argument has no merit. Before I can present my evidence it would help if you took some logic classes at the graduate level, history of science (pay particular attention to Mendel's Law). It would help too if you count the number of times your Biology textbooks unnecessarily use the word Evolution so that when I start explaining how brainwashing works you'll grasp the fact that you were brainwashed by religious fanatics which I'll happily prove to you. But first go read Aristotle and Plato. I've read Darwin's works as well as Einstein's works and found them logically unsound.

It's probably not a good idea to make assumptions about what one's fellow FReepers have read or not read. I try to avoid it. However, since you don't, I'll just say that the likelihood that you know more than I do about, say, Plato's thought is infinitesimally small.

That aside, if you're not using the Bible as scientific evidence, and if you reject Darwinism, perhaps you'd be willing to reveal how you yourself account for the phenomena that thousands of biologists and paleontologists around the world have sought to understand using evolution. And surely you've written about this somewhere; have you published your views?

Haven't you heard? One of their recent discoveries discredits everything that biologists and paleontologists have taught over the last 100 years. Turns out their time-line is all mucked up and their "links" aren't links, but don't worry two days later they began their spin all over again.
Paleontologists play in the dirt. Biologists are afraid to lose their jobs. When Evolution became "fashionable" and the "religion of the day," many scientists went along out of fear. Also, most high school biology teachers are not adequately trained in the sciences; they were education majors and often have taken just the lowest level science classes everyone else takes.
Many scientists around the world have begun to reject evolution. Even the advocates of evolution are backing down because now they are saying that evolution just means "change." In order to defend their religious dogma, they are now redefining it to the point that it is meaningless.
You still have to deal with the problem that Darwin's observations can be better explained by Mendel's Law. I can account for all the evolutionists in high places in the Universities with two words. "Religious Discrimination."