So far as I know, only one "pro-design" person on FR has ever consented to play "general_re's" "Design Inference Game" in which he offers up several images of objects and asks the contestant to decide whether the item is the result of natural processes or "intelligent design," and provide the reasoning behind their choice.
The reality is despite much posturing and boasting, nobody seems to be able to come up with a very reliable mechanism by which to distinguish design from nature in the absence the context of the object under discussion. Mere "observation" doesn't seem to work very well.
So many new people that I suppose it's really just a matter of time before someone else wanders into that position. It's a standing offer, if anyone else is feeling cocky about ID theory ;)