This thread is dead so I'll happily engage you all in a future one. Bye.
And labeling me a "naturalist" is not "name calling"? It's not the actual label, it's the tone that gives that message.
Your citations where abiogenesis is shown to be within Evolutionary theory are where? Dimensio challenged you multiple times to cite where you get that association and you cannot. So you claim the thread is dead and you bail.
Sore loser, if you ask me. And that's not "name calling", I believe it is a factual description of your state in this argument.
What is your agenda Dataman? Do you just like the emotional jolt of the argument? Perhaps you are a professional Creationist and this is how you make money? By talking to gullible churches who will take up a collection for you, or maybe writing Creationist propaganda.
I've made my agenda known. I believe this is a serious mistake for religious people to make this argument. I think more people will be led to reject God because of it, and that is a tragedy.
Perhaps I'm wrong, but that's what motivates me. What's your reason for being here? Perhaps you agree with me, and your very point of arguing Creationism is to kill the faith of some number of people? Or perhaps to give justification to the people who call Christians "dumb hicks". The more people you can get to repeat your half baked arguments, the worse Christianity will be viewed by many.
I still think you're James Carville over here on FR just having a great time impersonating a Creationist whacko. Your style of "debate" sounds just like him.