You fail to perceive the fallacy in your own argument. If God exists, miracles are automatically possible. If miracles are possible, naturalism is both unnecessary and false.
| For an evolutionist to appeal to God to explain all the problematic aspects of his irreparable theory is hypocrisy in the absolute sense since he mocks the creationist for doing supposedly the same thing. |
First, miracles must be possible. Many people believe they are, but many people believe in Nessie too. Neither are proven.
Second, you obviously can't comprehend the English language, because my original point was that Evolution could certianly have been "created" by God. Your statement that Evolution is "both unnecessary and false" in that case is not a rebuttal of my point.
Third, since my point has abosolutely nothing to do with whether God exists or not, there is no hypocracy accept in your "James Carville" style of argument.
That is you, isn't it Carville? How's Mary and the kids?