[Dimensio]

You're not so dense as to have missed the innumerable times people have pointed out that God could have zapped life into existence, and it then proceded to Evolve.

No, he's just a liar. He insists that evolution means godless naturalism, when it does not. He has been told that it does not mean this, he cannot cite a single scientific reference that authoratitavely claims this, but he repeats this claim anyway.

Dataman isn't interested in presenting rational arguments. His only purpose is to lie about evolution in the hopes that some naieve lurkers will see it and develop doubts based upon the strawman that he has presented. Dataman is one of the lowest of the creationist liars. He knows that his statements are false, and he doesn't even try to support them with facts. He just repeats the same lie that "evolution" = "atheistic naturalism" and that evolution somehow requires a completely specific (and completely naturalistic) origin for life even though the theory of evolution works regardless of how the first life forms came into existence in the first place.

Basically, Dataman can't argue against evolution based on facts, so he has to deliberately lie about what evolution states in order to form an argument against it. Nothing that Dataman says can be trusted, because he's already made it clear that he is a shameless liar.

[Dataman]

No, he's just a liar.

Are you afraid to address me?

Your adhominem fallacies are becoming a trademark. It's no wonder you fail to convince anyone. For a change, try refuting anything I say.