Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bond Producers to Make 'Casino Royale' Themselves (Without Brosnan or Tarantino)
WENN ^ | 12/01/04 | imdb staff

Posted on 12/01/2004 9:33:31 AM PST by gopwinsin04

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last
To: JoJo Gunn

Well it would be nice to see Peter Sellers' character moving in the Heaven sequence rather than the cardboard cutout that the producers were forced to use after Orson Welles' fit.


21 posted on 12/01/2004 11:09:06 AM PST by weegee (WE FOUGHT ZOGBYISM November 2, 2004 - 60 Million Voters versus 60 Minutes - BUSH WINS!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: gopwinsin04

What they need to do is bring spectre back into the bond movies.


22 posted on 12/01/2004 11:10:43 AM PST by Armedanddangerous (I'm not sorry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: gopwinsin04
They need "NEW" ideas, not reruns.

What made the oriuginal Bond films so great, among other things), was that it was cutting edge technology. Thunderball was filmed in 1965 for example with use of underwater jet boats.....real cool and not commercially available for years.

I'm sure there are hundreds of examples but the films always used thins that were real cutting edge for the times and many of these things actually became available to the retail market years later.

For example, perhaps they should use these eye in the sky plans we use in Iraq and elsewhere to see around corners.....etc.

23 posted on 12/01/2004 11:17:18 AM PST by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro

The invisible car in the last few films was a joke.


24 posted on 12/01/2004 11:22:14 AM PST by gopwinsin04
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: gopwinsin04
The invisible car in the last few films was a joke.

Exactly. Too much of a stretch, as are some other things. It can't be a mockery. The originals were almost believable.

25 posted on 12/01/2004 11:26:59 AM PST by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro
The originals were almost believable.

Moonraker - the exception that makes the rule.

26 posted on 12/01/2004 12:05:22 PM PST by VRWCmember ("The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but the heart of the fool to the left." Eccl. 10:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: VRWCmember
Moonraker - the exception that makes the rule.

Yes "BUT" it did use shuttles which docked at space stations.....at least that is believable. Sending poison into our atmosphere? Somewhat believable as well.

27 posted on 12/01/2004 12:12:08 PM PST by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro

Actually the US army is trying to use such technology on future tanks to camouflage them, so it's not such a stretch.


28 posted on 02/05/2005 10:33:12 AM PST by r5boston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson