You may have missed the one here,who repeatedly posted that there isn't anything at all wrong with child pornography and that he believed that the age of consent,for sex,should be 10;as should be the age one can vote,be.Then there were the ones who still say that the WoT is a fraud. I could go on and detail everything I've read here,posted by both big and little Lers;but that would be a waste of time and bandwidth.
And to tell people such as Howlin and myself,who have been here far longer than you have,know,for a certainty,what has gone on here for years,that we don't know what we're talking about,is puerile and egotism,on your part. We haven't told you what you think/know. LOL
Over the past 6+ years,I have seen Jim's views changed on any number of political things;Libertarianism included.To quote what he said 4 years ago,is thus silly in the extreme.Don't imagine that YOU can talk for him on that. Except for CCPing his various statements of the rules,is an act of supreme hubris!
I sense... sizzling.
You're painting all of FR's libertarians with a broad brush. 99% of us do not agree with such a thing. To make such implications is misleading and unfair. And Lord knows, you moderate FReepers sure have had your share of kooks in the past.
And to tell people such as Howlin and myself,who have been here far longer than you have,know,for a certainty,what has gone on here for years,that we don't know what we're talking about,is puerile and egotism,on your part.
I was politely suggesting that you may have made an honest mistake which many have made in the past. And bringing up the senority thing is gay.
Over the past 6+ years,I have seen Jim's views changed on any number of political things;Libertarianism included.
I just checked the sidebar, and the RLC still has their forum hosted here. I suppose he still has a favorable view towards small-l libertarians.