Yep! For a while now scientists and non-scientists alike--often motivated by non-scientific vested interests in molding social policy--have been misusing genetics as a Grand Unified Theory and advancing conclusions that harbor unexamined methodological assumptions and run way ahead of the evidence. Whenever science does this--as, for instance, famously occurred when 18th-century culture attempted to reduce all phenomena to Newtonian mechanism, only to have the neat package unravel with the rise of non-Euclidean geometry, statistical method, and finally the "New" Physics (now a century old, of course) and Godel's logic--there inevitably comes a crisis when the limitations of the paradigm bump up against the hard data and the fallacious hidden assumptions are exposed.
:') I would add that, philosophers tend to be people who need to be slapped around a lot.