Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ron Artest has no business in the NBA (live witness)
Detroit Free Press via The Miami Herald ^ | Nov. 20, 2004 | MICHAEL ROSENBERG

Posted on 11/20/2004 6:32:10 PM PST by monkapotamus

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 last
To: ClintonBeGone
Why must you be nasty? Do you think putdowns cover up a lack of knowledge?

No definition of any law stands on its own. Only statutes come close and then their interpretation and applications are up to the judge, usually following a set of guidelines made in past cases (precedent similar to that of the common law) and rules. Judgment must follow according to the fact of the case.

Counts in the common law are based entirely on precedent. If there is not a specific statute governing an exchange such as was in the article, it falls under the common law. Definitions are guidelines, as are common law maxims.

"Assaults" with a knife or a harmful weapon pull stiff penalties from common law precedent. "Assaults" involving just mild trespass usually involve a fine or an ass chewing from the judge. Or can be addressed by a civil action in trespass.

The prosecutors own statements support both my original statement and the definitions.

The prosecutor would be blowing wind. See if he actually pursues the charge. Anybody can wuff; it what is actually done that matters.

I doubt that any criminal proceedings for throwing a paper cup at a person would survive a courts dismissal. Dockets are too packed to mess with such de minimis issues.

But, then, by your own criteria, you must be "stupid" for not knowing all this, right?

41 posted on 11/23/2004 2:18:14 PM PST by William Terrell (Individuals can exist without government but government can't exist without individuals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: ClintonBeGone
And you'll soon be posting proper authority to back your (at this time) retorical claims?

I'm not prepared to post the rules of civil and criminal procedure, plus the rulings in similar cases state by state. Go down to your county law library and look them up yourself. What I said is common knowledge for anyone with a passing knowledge of court antics.

I have no intention of using hours of my time proving you don't know what you're talking about. I'll give you an overview, and you can take it or leave it. Unless you're willing to foot the bill for the research you demand. In that case, FRmail me and we'll set up a fee schedule.

Otherwise, if you don't like my answer, I reckon you'll just have to live with yourself not liking it.

In the future, please try to carry on a conversation with some mature decorum, that is to say, leave off some of the demeaning phrases. They add nothing to the conversation and skate the edge of FR forum rules.

Thank you.

42 posted on 11/23/2004 2:30:02 PM PST by William Terrell (Individuals can exist without government but government can't exist without individuals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson