Email Campaign Number 54,321. Spread it like a virus

Numbers USA ^ | 10/8/04 | Numbers USA

[4.1O dana super trac pak]

Don't worry, last letter I got from NumbersUSA stated they have over 50,000 faxers now. When I joined in 2002 there were about 3,000.

[Chong]

Thanks for the ping, Amy. BTTT

[texrep]

Read this somewhere...seems to apply to the flingers, attempting to overwhelm you with "facts". . .

Facts I can deal with. CBG's replies are non-replies. She, like several other grumpy old bags on this forum, have taken the art of being repulsive to new heights. If they can even stay on point at all, their arguments eventually become circular; they end up chasing their tails and they don't even knowing it.

Fact is, I can't fathom why she would spend time on this forum when she seems to have so little in common with most of the conservatives here. If I had a mind to, I would apply some shade tree psychology to the problem, but it just ain't worth the effort.

tex

[JustAmy]

It's great to see you again.

It has been awhile since I talked to you.

[Admin Moderator]

Cool it.

[NewRomeTacitus]

In your opinion, is ClintonBeGone anywhere correct when she stated "It's crazy to think that any state can superceed the clear commands of the Constitution that provides that Congress and ONLY Congress can dictate policy regarding one's country of origin." I know severe weakening of states' rights were implemented by court rulings during the 1920s and 1930's but am vague on how those rulings mean states have no right to defend themselves. As states still have their own parts of the National Guard under their governors' primary rule I can't see how that can be true. Or did this recent phenomenon of the Federal government using the Guards to shore up it's current military objectives without a draft to depend upon change the former rules (under the Patriot Act or Homeland Security provisions)?

For that matter, do citizens still have the right to band together in order to repel invasion like our founders did? They did so against English law for righteous cause. I can't see how citizens today can't do the same to preserve our nation when our ruling body won't carry out that necessary responsibility. We have to fulfill the sacred promise to our predecessors and insure our childrens' future over any lame-brained one-world path of least resistance. We must do what's right.

[Chong]

Hi, Amy,
It's great to see you again too. Things have been very hectic around here; we sold our house and had to move and hubby being a packrat, it took a while to pack up stuff and move. Some went to storage, some to the new house, etc.

Glad you pinged me on this, I will do what I can to help. You know, with all the stressful things going on, we couldn't stop grinning and smiling over the election! Thank God.

[JustAmy]

During the election, I ignored many things that needed to be taken care of. I'm now trying to catch up. :)

[Chong]

I know what you mean. In the mean time,

BTT very T!

[Bullish]

I can't believe you. Are you crazy?