To: weegee
Egads, what idiocy! There's barely a lefty talking point left unturned in this smorgasbord of stupidity.
2 posted on
11/06/2004 4:17:04 PM PST by
RightWingAtheist
(Krugman? More like Kool-Aid Man)
To: RightWingAtheist
There are a number of threads of Roger Ebert reviews and I am sure that they generate quite a bit of email.
This was an attempt to placate Roger's critics. Doesn't seem to have worked.
4 posted on
11/06/2004 4:28:56 PM PST by
weegee
(WE FOUGHT ZOGBYISM November 2, 2004 - 60 Million Voters versus 60 Minutes - BUSH WINS!!!)
To: RightWingAtheist
Sure is quick to fill up your BS Bingo card with the phrases in this piece of "journalism".
7 posted on
11/06/2004 4:41:28 PM PST by
weegee
(WE FOUGHT ZOGBYISM November 2, 2004 - 60 Million Voters versus 60 Minutes - BUSH WINS!!!)
To: RightWingAtheist
Here's a post from me that actually addresses one of the points in the article...
It's an election year -- and everything's debatable.
According to the press, even the content of this photo was debatable. The left said that it was "proof" that President Bush cheated in the debate that they also claim he did miserably in (Which way is it? Too good of a performance or he was unprepared?)
Unfortunately "facts are funny things" there is no "debating" whether he had a radio transmitter on or not. Either he DID or DIDN'T. You can debate points of opinion but facts are not determined by popular poll (i.e. "if we all agree it was a receiver, then it MUST be a receiver").
Here is another photo of Mr. President:
Same type of buldge. Accepted now as being a strap to hold his bulletproof vest in place.
19 posted on
11/06/2004 7:20:46 PM PST by
weegee
(WE FOUGHT ZOGBYISM November 2, 2004 - 60 Million Voters versus 60 Minutes - BUSH WINS!!!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson