Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What does it take to move 380 tons?

Posted on 10/26/2004 6:28:23 PM PDT by BobKrumm

As a former armor officer I’ve had the opportunity to supervise the loading of large amounts of ammunition and explosives on and off trucks. But never have I tried to move 380 tons, or three-quarters of a million pounds, of ammunition from one location to another. So I did a little math to see what it would take for a highly-organized and well-trained unit to move the quantity of explosives that was allegedly moved out of the Iraqi ammo depot 18 months ago.

It requires 30,400 armloads, at 25 pounds per armload, to move this amount of explosives. If you assume that one trip to the truck and back takes one minute (I timed myself from my living room to the end of my driveway and back at 59.6 seconds), then one man could load 1,000 pounds into a pickup truck every 40 minutes. That one man, assuming he worked 24 and 7 could load those trucks in slightly over 21 days.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last
As a former armor officer I’ve had the opportunity to supervise the loading of large amounts of ammunition and explosives on and off trucks. But never have I tried to move 380 tons, or three-quarters of a million pounds, of ammunition from one location to another. So I did a little math to see what it would take for a highly-organized and well-trained unit to move the quantity of explosives that was allegedly moved out of the Iraqi ammo depot 18 months ago.

It requires 30,400 armloads, at 25 pounds per armload, to move this amount of explosives. If you assume that one trip to the truck and back takes one minute (I timed myself from my living room to the end of my driveway and back at 59.6 seconds), then one man could load 1,000 pounds into a pickup truck every 40 minutes. That one man, assuming he worked 24 and 7 could load those trucks in slightly over 21 days.

If we increase the number of people to 10 and double the load of the pickups to 2,000 pounds, then it would take 51 hours of non-stop labor to move the explosives out of the ammo dump. But this assumes a never-ending supply of pickup trucks arriving at the facility every 8 minutes for over two straight days. 100 people could haul off the ammo in a little over five hours, but it would require a fresh truck every 48 seconds. Neither of the latter two scenarios is very plausible.

Let’s assume instead of carrying the ammunition to the trucks, the terrorist convey it “fire brigade style.” If the distance from ammunition to truck is 100 feet, then it would require 20 people passing 25 pounds of explosives at a time down the line from person to person. At the rate of one load every 5 seconds, it would take only three minutes and 20 seconds to fill a truck with 1,000 pounds of explosives. At that rate the entire stash could be carried off in 42 hours. But, again, it’s implausible because it would require 18 fresh trucks per hour for almost two days straight.

Keep in mind all these numbers only consider the loading of the ammunition. You have an equally labor-intensive task at the off-loading site. In short, it’s inconceivable that this amount of ammunition was spirited away undetected in an area where US troops were operating in the time that the UN, the New York Times, and CBS would have us believe. Something is fishy about this whole story.

1 posted on 10/26/2004 6:28:23 PM PDT by BobKrumm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BobKrumm

Duck feathers?


2 posted on 10/26/2004 6:29:06 PM PDT by 68 grunt (3/1 India, 3rd, 68-69, 0311)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BobKrumm
Forklifts?

Still doesn't overcome the need for lots and lots of trucks.

3 posted on 10/26/2004 6:30:48 PM PDT by atomicpossum (If there are two Americas, John Edwards isn't qualified to lead either of them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BobKrumm

Ask John Edwards.


4 posted on 10/26/2004 6:31:03 PM PDT by Pete'sWife (Dirt is for racing... asphalt is for getting there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BobKrumm

If the men loading the trucks are union, you're gonna have to redo your numbers.


5 posted on 10/26/2004 6:31:09 PM PDT by tsmith130 ("Some folks look at me and see a certain swagger, which in Texas is called "walking."" - GWB)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BobKrumm
ask michael moore's chauffeur.
6 posted on 10/26/2004 6:31:23 PM PDT by flashbunny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BobKrumm

Maybe one huge forklift driven by a camel driver and a really beeeeeg truck?????


7 posted on 10/26/2004 6:31:46 PM PDT by cynicom (<p)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 68 grunt

I heard the stuff has the consistence of corn starch maybe the Iraqis used it for coffee creamer or to make gravy. LOL


8 posted on 10/26/2004 6:32:34 PM PDT by Rodm (Seest thou a man diligent in his business? He shall stand before kings)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BobKrumm

So 380 tons of explosives could disappear, but WMD's could not? [That's directed at the ABB crowd - not you]


9 posted on 10/26/2004 6:32:37 PM PDT by Eccl 10:2 (Tell your like-minded friends to tell their like-minded friends to get out and vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BobKrumm

We generally used forklifts which we hauled with us. All looters have 40 ten ton tractor trailer rigs, a couple of fuel tankers, a few wheeled forklifts and 100 islamofascists when looting behind enemy lines with helos, fixed wing and satellite constantly scanning the battlefield.


10 posted on 10/26/2004 6:32:41 PM PDT by jwalsh07 (Always ask yourself, does this pass the Global Test?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tsmith130

Smith....bob is negligent in not using union rules, have to redo the whole thing.


11 posted on 10/26/2004 6:33:09 PM PDT by cynicom (<p)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: atomicpossum

Gravel trucks haul 20 tons at a time. That makes 19 trucks.


12 posted on 10/26/2004 6:33:38 PM PDT by FreeInWV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BobKrumm

Got to agree with you... being on the working end of a loading work party in the Navy.. (Moving ammo around the boat by hand)

The speed, weight, and distances moved are all good factors that you pointed out in your piece... the other factor of which I am sure that you are aware.. is the man power doing the job..in fact you do state it too in you writing...
Highly trained profesional soldier can do it quickly... a group of terrorist former saddam reqieme members and forgien fighter moving this hardly constitutes well trained military personal.... go piece.


13 posted on 10/26/2004 6:33:42 PM PDT by Americanwolf (Paintball Gun: $44..Accessories: $55. Protecting campaign sign from Union thugs: Priceless!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BobKrumm

I just did some math. It would take over 300 pickup trucks to haul all those explosives. Somehow they did all that completely UNDETECTED.


14 posted on 10/26/2004 6:35:16 PM PDT by PJ-Comix (Join the DUmmie FUnnies PING List for the FUNNIEST Blog on the Web)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BobKrumm

Britt Hume said 38 semi-truck loads.


15 posted on 10/26/2004 6:35:19 PM PDT by motife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BobKrumm

The "typewriter" element has been found.

Well done 'Effin, you 'effed up a'gin.


16 posted on 10/26/2004 6:35:53 PM PDT by crazycat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BobKrumm
I would imagine that they are working overtime in the Pentagon reviewing recon & satelite images as well as bomb damage assesment data on that site from back in the spring of 2003 to see if they can determine what happened. Also Saddam is in custody - who knows maybe they can get some info out of him.

It may take a few days but this is going to blow up big time in Kerry's face.

17 posted on 10/26/2004 6:35:58 PM PDT by Smoote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #18 Removed by Moderator

To: BobKrumm
The UN lost the explosives on their watch. The UN "guarded" the explosives with some tape and a little tag, and a promise from Saddam. So Kerry is right about "incompetence", but it was the incompetence of the UN, not President Bush or our military. So what is Kerry's response to this shocking incompetence from the UN?

Listen HERE.
19 posted on 10/26/2004 6:39:04 PM PDT by counterpunch (The CouNTeRPuNcH Collection - www.counterpunch.us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: irondog

Abdul, Ahmed, Chirac and a lot of camels?????


20 posted on 10/26/2004 6:40:22 PM PDT by cynicom (<p)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson