To: brookwood
They may be pre 1991 but they were not destroyed and could still be used for intended purpose. (and they say there are no WMD's)
5 posted on
10/07/2004 2:31:32 PM PDT by
Americanwolf
("Be vwey vwey quite! I am hunting DU Twolls! ---Elwer Fuwd Fwee wepubwic member and cawtoon icon)
To: Americanwolf
Is this report coming in in time for use in tomorrow's debate? I would love to hear the President announce this. I am so bloody TIRED of hearing "no WMDs."
17 posted on
10/07/2004 2:34:25 PM PDT by
EggsAckley
(..........So many vanities.................so little bandwidth............)
To: Americanwolf
And they were probably counted among the "destroyed."
Wonder what else will be dug up?
20 posted on
10/07/2004 2:36:48 PM PDT by
Dr. Eckleburg
(John Kerry is a GirlyManchurian Candidate.)
To: Americanwolf
You are right they still are inherently dangerous and could still kill many. 53 weapons of this type could kill 100s of thousands of people and do consitute a stockpile Sarin based weapons.
27 posted on
10/07/2004 2:40:50 PM PDT by
DarthVader
(Defeating John Kerry is just as important as destroying Al-Queada!!!!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson