To: Cyclopean Squid
The Panthers really made it interesting, but the Pats would not be denied. They would have been denied in both SB if the boston mob had not paid off the refs. Oakland beat them and last year the refs robbed the Colts of a win. They even made a huge deal out of enforcing the rules after the manhandling the Pats put on the Colts recievers.
40 posted on
10/05/2004 10:50:16 AM PDT by
winodog
(We need to water the liberty tree)
To: winodog
They would have been denied in both SB if the boston mob had not paid off the refs. Do you take swiss, or cambert with your whine?
41 posted on
10/05/2004 10:51:37 AM PDT by
bikepacker67
(Sandy wasn't stuffing his socks, he was stuffing A sock.)
To: winodog
They would have been denied in both SB if the boston mob had not paid off the refs. Oakland beat them and last year the refs robbed the Colts of a win. They even made a huge deal out of enforcing the rules after the manhandling the Pats put on the Colts recievers. Oh geez... I suppose the payoff is also responsible for the 18 game winning streak the Pats are currently enjoying, right?
More cheese, perhaps? Can't have whine without it ;0)
66 posted on
10/05/2004 1:09:58 PM PDT by
Chad Fairbanks
(How do you ask a hamster to be the last hamster to die for a mistake?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson