Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: reed13

wait. this makes no sense. the SATs are graded on increments of 10. you can't get a 566 in a section. It's either 560 or 570. Maybe they have been changed, but that just doesn't seem right.


18 posted on 10/04/2004 2:40:29 PM PDT by kfowler1 (Joined FR as a response to Dan Rather's great blunder.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: kfowler1

Well .... his might be wrong - preferrably for my ego on the high side.... but I know mine are right 620M/600V - see I'm naturally balanced. %)


22 posted on 10/04/2004 2:42:21 PM PDT by reed13
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: kfowler1

I got a 566 also on the verbal back in 1966. Scored higher than that on the math. Guess the scoring has changed since then.


37 posted on 10/04/2004 2:58:41 PM PDT by MAWG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: kfowler1

Bingo. I doubt sincerely that these numbers are true.

Ain't NO WAY O'Reilly got 1585 nohow.


61 posted on 10/04/2004 4:15:03 PM PDT by LibertarianInExile (The Fourth Estate is the Fifth Column.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: kfowler1
you can't get a 566 in a section. It's either 560 or 570

You could when Bush and I took them. For instance, my math score was 753, an uneven number. Do ask me why, I'm not that good at politically correct math....

76 posted on 10/04/2004 7:28:03 PM PDT by patriciaruth (They are all Mike Spanns)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson