[Prime Choice]

The debunking would have been more persuasive if they actually pointed out what the "glurge" was.

Oh come on.

http://www.snopes.com/glurge/

[Truthsearcher]

Oh come on what?

I read the article, I don't need you to link to me again. Now tell me, where did the article point out any falsehoods, other than claiming that those men suffered as revolutionaries in general and not as signers specifically. All I ask is proof that those men did not suffer in the way the article said they did, it would be simple to proof or disproof those claims, not one time did Snopes say that any of the tales involving any of them were false.