Link?
How very strange. I hope that quote makes some headlines.
I think your post will get pulled as a duplicate soon, but I hope Rush and others hit hard on this one tomorrow. It truly is hugh!
"KERRY: With respect to Iran, the British, French, and Germans were the ones who initiated an effort without the United States, regrettably, to begin to try to move to curb the nuclear possibilities in Iran. I believe we could have done better.
I think the United States should have offered the opportunity to provide the nuclear fuel, test them, see whether or not they were actually looking for it for peaceful purposes. If they weren't willing to work a deal, then we could have put sanctions together. The president did nothing."
http://desmoinesregister.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20040930/NEWS09/40930003
That would be interesting! The Israelis have promised to destroy the reactors before the Iranians can put fuel in them and we sold them a whole bunch of smart bombs just last week. I wonder if Kerry is aware of this. :^)
Yeah, great poll question there. "Should the U.S. sell nuclear fuel to Iran?"
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1232125/posts
Le ZOTTE: My very IMPORTANT opinion on tonight's debate. VERY IMPORTANT BREAKING NEWS VANITY! MUST R
Posted on 09/30/2004 10:56:49 PM CDT by Jim Robinson
NO ONE ELSE THOUGHT OF THIS SO IT DESERVES A THREAD OF ITS OWN!
Here's how it works, we put a bit of it in each box of Cracker Jacks, then sell them 7839 boatloads of Cracker Jacks. See? It's simple, when ya know whut yer doin.
Yes, he said that.. Plus we need to "Pass a global test" before defending America.