Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: AZLiberty
Seems to me that this computer model's conclusions would be hard to prove..

First, it's a "simulation"..
Second, it's a "probability model"..

If we were talking Global Warming, we would dismiss it out of hand..

7 posted on 10/01/2004 3:49:44 AM PDT by Drammach (Freedom; not just a job, it's an adventure..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Drammach
First, it's a "simulation"..
Second, it's a "probability model"..

As a civil engineer I can guarantee that every time you walk into a building you're staking your life on both. 

The math isn't too hard to follow.  We all had two parents, four grand parents, eight-- well, you get the picture.   Pat Paulsen said this proves the world population is obviously shrinking, but I think it shows that the world's common ancestry could be as recent as about 30 generations, or 600 years. 

Hopkin took this idea a step further and plugged in how much people travel and showed that our common grandpa shouldn't be farther back than 3500 years. 

It's "probably" true.

8 posted on 10/01/2004 4:37:14 AM PDT by expat_panama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson