Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Truth666

Nice try. What facts are you talking about? So far, you have not based any "hoaxation" on a fact.

Indeed, you have tried to distort a fact: Comet Bradford is NOT 10000km large. The actual cometary body, or head, is at most 10 miles large. The rest of the 'size' is its coma and dust cloud. And, since those particles have acheived escape velocity relative to the comet, they are considered independent members of the solar system.

Ever hear of C/2001 Q4 (NEAT)? Well, that was discovered, grew to magnitude 4, and faded. No big deal there. I never saw it....but then again the sky conditions were terrible for the two weeks when it COULD have been seen visually. But that does not mean it wasn't there.

And as for moving to another thread. Go Pound Sand.


30 posted on 09/29/2004 6:34:07 AM PDT by Turk82_1 (They also serve who merely stand and wait.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: Turk82_1

I saw the pictures of Toutatis...it should be named "TURD"-atis! Its the attack of the Space Feces...run for your lives!


31 posted on 09/29/2004 6:47:20 AM PDT by mdmathis6 (The Democrats must be defeated in 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

To: Turk82_1
In the context of the Toutatis hoax, it is irrelevant what part of comet Bradfield is 10,000 km large :
- nobody was able to predict that a body with a VISIBLE round structure 10,000 km wide (and how many km of visible tail ???) would be approaching the sun
- while they want us to believe that they "watching closely" a body "about 2.9 miles long and 1.5 miles wide". So closely that they were even able to "see" ist "weird shape" ...
32 posted on 09/29/2004 6:58:10 AM PDT by Truth666
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson