Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is there definitive evidence that the Pentagon was hit by a commercial airliner?

Posted on 09/17/2004 5:33:35 AM PDT by HankReardon

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 last
To: garbanzo
"There is videotape of the plane hitting the Pentagon from one of the security cameras."

Has that ever been made public? I'm not too sure whether I heard that it really existed or not. I have no doubts whatsoever about the plane hitting the pentagon but it would be interesting to see this. Wasn't the plane speed somewhere in the vicinity of 350 knots at impact? I couldn't imagine actually witnessing something like that. For that matter, standing on the ground and witnessing the WTC plane impacts either. The video capture is still truly horrific but I'm sure it loses a little on tape as opposed to seeing it in person.

41 posted on 09/17/2004 5:47:22 AM PDT by Hatteras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia

You'd have to know him, don't you know a Bush hating Kool Aid drinker that wants to believe this crap?


42 posted on 09/17/2004 5:49:44 AM PDT by HankReardon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Hatteras
Has that ever been made public?

I saw it posted here soon after the attacks.

43 posted on 09/17/2004 5:50:40 AM PDT by garbanzo (Free people will set the course of history)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: BureaucratusMaximus

>>>This stuff really makes me LMAO. I swear, that if the left thought they could get away with it...they'd say that the WTC attacks and collapses never happened either...using the line "WTC? what is the WTC? They never existed!"

Before I found FR, I use to use the Yahoo message board that followed news stories.

I swear, that was the first propaganda spin that was tried. WTC never happened. What I couldn't follow from this spin was, were they saying the Towers were never there? Or were they saying the Towers never collapsed?

They couldn't answer that one either.


44 posted on 09/17/2004 5:52:47 AM PDT by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: HankReardon

This thread sure got a lot of replies very quickly, it hasn't been on even 20 minutes yet. Thanks Freepers!


45 posted on 09/17/2004 5:52:47 AM PDT by HankReardon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HankReardon
I have a co-worker who is a complete, off-the-wall liberal conspiracy kook. I mean this guy is so left that he was complaining after watching Fahrenheit 9-11 that Micheal Moore went to easy on Bush...

Here's the theory as he explained it to me (as much as I could hear while laughing as hard as I was)...

A week before 9-11 there was a news report about a piece of space debris from an old Russian rocket burning up in the atmosphere and leaving a trail that was seen over the east coast. This wasn't really a piece of space debris, it was a cruise missile test in preparation for 9-11. Supposedly it couldn't have been space debris because it was traveling from south to north instead of east to west.

The attack on the first tower of the world trade center and pentagon was by cruise missiles. The second tower was hit later by a remote controlled plane because there would be cameras on the scene by then to record it. The plane that was suppose to have crashed into the pentagon was shot down over camp David and the bodies and pieces were transported by truck to the pentagon to be discovered by the recovery crews.

The attack was planed by President Bush with the help of the CIA for a reason to invade the middle east. The reason there was no pictures of the cruise missile (plane) hitting the pentagon was that the CIA had rented all the buildings surrounding the pentagon to make sure nobody had a camera. The plane in Pennsylvania was shot down by an Air National Guard fighter by order of the President and when the pilot found out that it was a plane full of civilians and was going to go public he was found dead.

The sad thing he REALLY believe this is the gospel truth !?!

46 posted on 09/17/2004 5:53:58 AM PDT by apillar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HankReardon
I was hoping for a thread to send back disproving facts,

Not necessary. the burden of proof is on them. As CBS is finding out, mere allegations don't cut it. Ask them for a picture of the missle.

47 posted on 09/17/2004 5:54:32 AM PDT by CharacterCounts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: HankReardon

Oh absolutely. But irregarless of what you say or show, you will not alter that way of thinking.

That thought pattern is fueled by hate. Hate has no logic. The anger needs to be managed first.


48 posted on 09/17/2004 5:56:30 AM PDT by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: HankReardon

Okay brother-in-law Tim? Are you going to forsake the future security of this nation by turning the Oval Office back over to the disasterously inept Democrats? let me know when you want me to bring your Bush/Cheney2004 lawn sign over to you, I'll be right on it!


49 posted on 09/17/2004 5:59:18 AM PDT by HankReardon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HankReardon

The same ones who say they pentagon damage was too small also claim the WTC damage was too large.


50 posted on 09/17/2004 5:59:53 AM PDT by HapaxLegamenon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HankReardon

Hank - don't feel bad. I had to take my 17 yr old son through the facts.

He got some contrary 'information' at school. Imagine that.


51 posted on 09/17/2004 6:05:42 AM PDT by Blueflag (Res ipsa loquitor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: apillar

You forgot the part about how all the "Jews" were forewarned and did not show up to work that day. ;-)


52 posted on 09/17/2004 6:07:50 AM PDT by Blueflag (Res ipsa loquitor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Blueflag

Your Right ! (that must have been the part I missed from laughing to loud)


53 posted on 09/17/2004 6:09:16 AM PDT by apillar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: HankReardon

You brother in law needs to invest in the Reynolds Co.


54 posted on 09/17/2004 6:09:18 AM PDT by Osage Orange (I'm a man.............I can change.............If I have to..................I guess...........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: HankReardon

Uncle Leo..... Is that you?


55 posted on 09/17/2004 6:12:25 AM PDT by TruthFactor (A mind is a terrible thing to waste with with a PC Education.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HankReardon

Read the official 9/11 Commission Report. It's all in there. I'm not blaming you but these conspiracy theories regarding this are the work of buffoons. I wouldn't dignify it.


56 posted on 09/17/2004 6:24:59 AM PDT by RichardW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

apparently the CNN footage of the Pentagon broadcasted 9/11 shows body bags ... and they aren't wrapped in tin foil


57 posted on 09/17/2004 6:55:51 AM PDT by Truth666
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: HankReardon

How about the fact that I lost 3 co-workers on Flight 77?

RIP

Ruben Ornedo
Chandler Keller
DC Lee


58 posted on 09/17/2004 7:52:40 AM PDT by So Cal Rocket (Proud Member: Internet Pajama Wearers for Truth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson