Posted on 09/15/2004 5:48:27 PM PDT by www.hunderdpercenter.com
He keeps calling him a leprechan!
LOL
I don't understand this stradling the fence. The liberals accuse commentators of being biased. Which is ridiculous as that is exactly what you expect from commentators. Liberals do it constantly. So why give in and try to prove one is "balanced". I love Dennis Miller, but he does this too. When he has those panels he always included one or two nutball liberals. Why even bother? It's not news. It's his show. He can be as biased as he wants to be. I mean I can understand avoiding partisanship - always agreeing with Republicans for example. But nothing wrong with being an avowed conservative.
>>>> When he has those panels he always included one or two nutball liberals. Why even bother? It's not news. It's his show.
Why bother?! Put the libs on to attract libs to watch the show. Make them particularly nutball libs in order to have them get trounced. He is not putting on the show simply to satisfy his own ego -- he is rightly trying to do something with it. Why just preach to the choir when you can get the infidels to listen in too?
That's if you actually believe there is hope for liberals. I see your point. I never thought of it that way.
She crushed him like a grape.
he goes on and on in his show about how someone who is either left or right would not want to hear someone who believes the same way they do, that would be boring... Here is a clue Billbaby, being wishy-washy is totally boring... I hold up old horse-puke face as an example. His pompous pontificating bores the livinsh*t out of me..
He isn't the only one.
I remember a week or so ago, there were a lot of freepers upset with Savage for coming down on Rush. Personally, I think it's healthy to have our own disagreements amongst ourselves. It shows we are not sheep like the lefties are and accuse us of being.
I happen to like Michael Savage. Tonight he said that Rush was the most powerful man in radio, but he feels Rush is not critical enough of Bush. And it is true, Bush is a great president, but... a couple things I have to disagree with. The amnesty for illegal aliens probably being my biggest complaint. Savage will criticize Bush from a right wing point of view, (very different from when a liberal ATTACKS and smears Bush, for different reasons).
Anyway, I guess my point is... I saw a lot of people in here say very distateful things about Savage the other week, while many of us like him. (He's my second favorite after Mark Levin)... Others have Rush as thier favorite. The point is, we're not sheep. The liberals like to refer to us as sheep. That we're all "Rush ditto-heads" when actually, we're not. We disagree on some minor stuff which proves we're opened minded.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.