To: inquest
ok lets see here...
he wants to put God at the foundation of the country and he is talking about a national election. It isnt a stretch to see that he means making God the foundation of the government, at least that is how I read it and that is exactly what the founding fathers wished to avoid.
45 posted on
09/12/2004 2:15:15 PM PDT by
MikefromOhio
(Free Republic - Only as "free" as those that post on it want it to be!!!)
To: MikeinIraq
I can't speak for the poster in question, but I know that the Constitution Party's various statements have been to the effect that government should respect the fact that the country is founded on acknowledgement of divine providence; therefore it should not be out to enforce any kind of militant secularism on society, as it's been doing. I've seen absolutely nothing in their platform that suggests anything "theocratic" - nothing at all that would infringe on anyone's rights of conscience, or treat anyone differently based on religious views or practices.
46 posted on
09/12/2004 2:28:29 PM PDT by
inquest
(Judges are given the power to decide cases, not to decide law)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson