Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: inquest

ok lets see here...

he wants to put God at the foundation of the country and he is talking about a national election. It isnt a stretch to see that he means making God the foundation of the government, at least that is how I read it and that is exactly what the founding fathers wished to avoid.


45 posted on 09/12/2004 2:15:15 PM PDT by MikefromOhio (Free Republic - Only as "free" as those that post on it want it to be!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]


To: MikeinIraq
I can't speak for the poster in question, but I know that the Constitution Party's various statements have been to the effect that government should respect the fact that the country is founded on acknowledgement of divine providence; therefore it should not be out to enforce any kind of militant secularism on society, as it's been doing. I've seen absolutely nothing in their platform that suggests anything "theocratic" - nothing at all that would infringe on anyone's rights of conscience, or treat anyone differently based on religious views or practices.
46 posted on 09/12/2004 2:28:29 PM PDT by inquest (Judges are given the power to decide cases, not to decide law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson