SHOULD O'REILLY HAVE KITTY KELLY ON (VOTE)?

O'Reilly web-page ^

[Snoopers-868th]

http://www.billoreilly.com/

[Snoopers-868th]

This was my comment--I voted AND sent an e-mail.

Should O'Reilly have Kitty Kelly on his show?

Not before he takes his time to read and reasearch the truth/non-truths of the stories in her book (same as he did for O'Neil).

Then O'Reilly should inteview the participants of the Stolen Honor documentary telling how Kerry aided the enemy.

(name and town)

[JesseJane]

I can't watch B.O. anymore.

Beyond the obvious reasons, his hands are too hairy.. He talks alot with his hands, and I find I can not hear what he is saying as those hairy hands are flailing around...

;)

[Jaysun]

NO! Not O'Reilly.

His desire to be "fair" would just give her a stage to spew her tripe unchallenged.

[Buttaboom]

Beyond the obvious reasons, his hands are too hairy.. He talks alot with his hands, and I find I can not hear what he is saying as those hairy hands are flailing around...

LOL - this reminds me of my Arthur Kent story. Back when he was covering the Gulf War and being called Scud Stud, I had a mini crush on him. Then he appeared on Donahue (I only watched to see him!) in a black jacket covered in dandruff. I haven't been able to look at him since, not even on the History Channel where I presume they clean him up and brush him off before taping his bits. Now I'm going to have to watch BOR just to see if his hairy hands bother me, lol.

[JesseJane]

Ewwwwwww, what a letdown! I'll tell ya right now, you watch those hands, the image will be seared, seared in your memory.. (Couldn't pass that up).. hehehe. :)