I had tried to post something earlier, but, consider vanity, so I hope this remains.
I have been following the BG for awhile. She gives interviews only to the foreign press. When I saw the exclusive and what she had to say, I was so angry. I mean, I would kick her out as well, or keep her from talking while this is in the courts. But, hey, she did not know anything, did not see anything and has nothing to say. But, why was she on Matthews then.
At least the Sen. tried to correct the record.
And, if the responsible officer knew nothing about conditions at Abu Ghraib, how can she say anybody in the Pentagon would know?
Karpinski is a readily identifiable liberal: nothing is ever her fault.
In her case, her command was completely dorked up, which was her responsibility. Her command has done more damage to our efforts in Iraq than even the apparent lack of stockpiles of WMD (the illegal program to turn SA-2s into ballistic missiles doesn't rise to level of high crimes and misdemeanors.)
Several years ago the Navy lost a true hero, Stanley Arthur who made the mistake of telling a senator that one of his constituents was in fact a horrible pilot despite being a female. He lost his job for telling the truth, something this MP general has yet to do.