I know there are some number crunchers out there.
To: Conservomax

AAAACCCK! Calculus = Marty repellant.
To: Conservomax
3 posted on
08/16/2004 2:48:39 PM PDT by
Camachee
(`)
To: Conservomax
4 posted on
08/16/2004 2:49:34 PM PDT by
WOSG
(George W Bush - Right for our Times!)
To: Conservomax
What are you solving for? The slope? F?
5 posted on
08/16/2004 2:49:44 PM PDT by
RightWhale
(Withdraw from the 1967 UN Outer Space Treaty and establish property rights)
To: Conservomax
F(x) = mx + 4x or
y=(4+m)x . . . It's a straight line through the origin with slope 4+m
To: Conservomax
f(x)=mx + 4x... um.. I think there is something wrong with how that is written. Since m is a constant, you can rewrite the function as f(x) = (m+4)x, and since m is an arbitrary constant, it could very well be f(x) = mx.
7 posted on
08/16/2004 2:50:26 PM PDT by
Frohickey
To: Conservomax
You have a single equation with two unknowns, m and x. It takes two equationa to solve this. Conventionally, m would be defined in the second equation as a constant. For example, the second equarion could be m=1.
Then your original equation would be simplified to y=(1+4)x or y=5x. That plots as a straight lice through the origin with a slope of 5.
9 posted on
08/16/2004 2:56:12 PM PDT by
LOC1
To: Conservomax
10 posted on
08/16/2004 2:57:48 PM PDT by
hflynn
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson