Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Tamar1973
typical lashon hara argument. if you can't win on points of fact, make up lies about your opponent.

LOL - lies ? - I only stated my conclusions based on your comments - you can either ignore them, dispute them or refute them - that choice is yours -

It was however a republican piece of legislation was it not ?

Sounds to me youre having a hard time admitting you were incorrect in light of the civil rights act

Look - I dont agree with the law either - there are far too many regs imposed on private business - but law is law - and this place is clearly in violation of it

50 posted on 08/05/2004 11:35:00 AM PDT by Revelation 911
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]


To: Revelation 911
It was however a republican piece of legislation was it not ?

yes, the civil rights act of 1965 was largely a republican piece of legislation. However, business owners have freedom of religion, too and I feel this woman is a money-grubber, pure and simple.

Accusing me of being a DU plant without a single source of evidence other than the fact that I might disagree with you on this paricular matter is why you lost the argument before you presented it. That is slander or lashon hara and I'm still waiting for the apology.

52 posted on 08/05/2004 11:45:46 AM PDT by Tamar1973 ("He who is compassionate to the cruel, ends up being cruel to the compassionate." Chazal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson