Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Just curious.
1 posted on 07/31/2004 4:01:03 PM PDT by MosesKnows
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: MosesKnows

I suggest "Unholy Matrimony"


2 posted on 07/31/2004 4:02:17 PM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MosesKnows
Fagtromony.

Dyketromony.

The Paired Perverts.

Confusion beyond comprehension.

3 posted on 07/31/2004 4:03:52 PM PDT by MarineDad (Whenever mosques and JDAM's meet, civilization benefits.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MosesKnows
Fagtromony.

Dyketromony.

The Paired Perverts.

CBI -Confusion beyond imagination.

4 posted on 07/31/2004 4:04:49 PM PDT by MarineDad (Whenever mosques and JDAM's meet, civilization benefits.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MosesKnows

I think a more proper name for it would be Same Gender Union. We are different genders, not different sexes. Sex is something we do, not something we are.


5 posted on 07/31/2004 4:08:22 PM PDT by buffyt (Democrats are representative of the nation only if the nation we're talking about is Brazil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MosesKnows

'Smerge,' 'Smerged,' and 'Smerriage.' Coined on FR many months ago.


6 posted on 07/31/2004 4:08:38 PM PDT by Eastbound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MosesKnows

My nephew lives very very happily with another man. Yet I know heterosexuals who have had 3 to 6 divorces. That is worse. Especially when they have CHILDREN. But divorced people just rag on and on about the gays. The gays mostly just want to be left alone. If anyone is SERIOUS about marriage being between ONE man and ONE woman, there should be NO DIVORCE period.


7 posted on 07/31/2004 4:10:13 PM PDT by buffyt (Democrats are representative of the nation only if the nation we're talking about is Brazil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MosesKnows
Queeriage.


8 posted on 07/31/2004 4:12:53 PM PDT by unixfox (Close the borders, problems solved!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MosesKnows

Hmmm.

Marriage = matrimony

Spinsters = spinstrimony

Bachelors = bachelormony


and continuing the march ...

Juveniles = juvemony

Large Choirs = harmony

Animals = animony

Plants = biomony

Currency = monimony

GED/SAT Exams = testimony

Numismatists = centimony

Hollywood Stars = acrimony

Criminals = crimony

Fish = piscimony


9 posted on 07/31/2004 4:22:50 PM PDT by NicknamedBob (When you've forgotten your drink, you've had enough! ... Unless it's coffee -- then you need more!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MosesKnows

Just FYI, the challenge won't be on 14th amendment grounds. The 14th applies only when the gov't classifies people. The gov't is not classifying people as homosexual or heterosexual and denying them rights on the basis of that classification. Any man can marry a woman, whatever his sexuality, and any woman can marry a man regardless of hers. That doesn't really address the problem as the gay activists see it, but the 14th amendment is constructed so that it isn't applied in this case. Their argument will be either Full Faith and Credit for Massachusetts marriages or a 5th amendment due process theory claiming marriage is a fundamental right being unduly burdened.

On topic, watch the cultural fight over the word used. Most gay activists are schooled heavily in the theories of postmodern deconstructionism, in which words with negative connotations are "tools of oppression" and using different words to define different concepts is "segregation".


10 posted on 07/31/2004 10:09:03 PM PDT by RexDart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson