I would like to know what the difference is between Moore doing anti-war propaganda on film, and Kerry doing anti-war propaganda LIVE on the streets of the United States, and in (lying) testimony before the Senate.
Can someone tell me why Moore was wrong and Kerry was not?
There was a desire to "put things in the past" after Vietnam. Draft dodgers were absolved.
John Kerry confessed to war crimes. Is there a statute of limitations on such activities? The continued trials of old Nazi guards would indicate "no".
John Kerry testified to these crimes before Congress. He has since come forward to say that those were the words of an angry young man (possibly given to exageration). Either he lied in a time of war in a manner designed to give aid and comfort to the enemy while demoralizing American troops or else he is an unindicted criminal (and possibly he is both).
Traitors are unable to serve as President. If Kerry wins, I push for the prosecution of John Kerry (even if it means being saddled with President Edwards).
We prosecuted people for treason after WWII and got some convictions. I'm sure that there could have been more.