Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: nustart23

It would be more effective to mete out severe punishments for drunk driving BEFORE the drunk kills someone. As it stands now, someone who is stopped for out-of-control driving and found to be drunk (or under the influence of some other recreational drug) rarely even spends a day in prison. A year in the slammer for first offense driving drunk, without hitting anything, and people would stop thinking it's fun and cool to get behind the wheel after a couple of drinks. Ten years for a second offense.


9 posted on 07/01/2004 11:59:29 AM PDT by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: GovernmentShrinker

It would be more effective to eliminate the current insurance laws and charge any driver that damages other persons property with equal criminal charges. Any driver causing the death of another person should be charged with manslaughter. Any driver causing damage to another person's property should be required to pay for the damages.

We all know that speeding causes the deaths of people, should we put all speeders in prison for a year for the first offense and 10 years for their second offense?


20 posted on 07/02/2004 5:22:38 AM PDT by CSM (Liberals may see Saddam's mass graves in Iraq as half-full, but I prefer to see them as half-empty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson