Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Riley
Speaking of 'burrows', where exactly does the notion come from, apart from movies like 'Deep Impact', that one would be any safer underground?

This isn't just a 'bigger nuclear strike'. Personally, I'd just as soon take my chances on a bald hilltop on very high ground, rather than deal with the massive ground shock wave that's ring the Earth like a bell and possibly collapse even reinforced subterranean structures.

Probably because of the firestorms. Read below:

Dino-killing asteroid sparked global fires, scientists believe

By Richard Stenger

CNN

(CNN) --A giant space rock that hit the Earth eons ago scattered high-velocity rubble over the planet, setting off wildfires that quickly spread over much of the equatorial region, North America and the Indian subcontinent, scientists announced this week.

The instant inferno, thought to have hastened the end of the dinosaurs, could have spared Europe, northern Asia, Antarctica and much of Australia, according to David Kring of the University of Arizona and Daniel Durda of the Southwest Research Institute.

The duo, who speculated that the mega-blazes needed only several days to spread around the world, said the horrific scenario followed the impact of a big space boulder in Chicxulub, Mexico.

"The fires were generated after debris ejected from the crater was lofted far above the Earth's atmosphere and rained back down over a period of about four days," Kring said.

"Like countless trillions of meteors, the debris heated the atmosphere and surface temperatures so intensely that ground vegetation spontaneously ignited."

An immense impact crater lies beneath the site in the Yucatan Peninsula. The blast, which took place 65 million years ago, heralded the end of the Cretaceous Period.

More than three-quarters of the plant and animal species on the planet did not survive the transition to the Tertiary Period, when mammals replaced dinosaurs as the dominant species.

The collision unleashed an estimated 10 billion times more energy than did the atomic bombs dropped on Japan, the scientists said.

Some debris concentrated around the impact site and more drifted westward over the spinning Earth and concentrated on the opposite side around India, the researchers said.

"The material was launched around Earth," Kring said. "Then, because the Earth rotates, it turned beneath [the] plume of debris and the fires migrated westward. That's what caused the wildfire pattern."

The study, published in the Journal of Geophysical Research, elaborates on rudimentary climate wildfire models developed by University of Arizona planetary scientist Jay Melosh and others.

"We've added more detail in re-evaluating the extent of the wildfires. Our new calculations show that the fires were not ignited in a single pulse, but in multiple pulses at different times around the world," Kring said.

Planetary scientist Frank Kyte of the University of California, Los Angeles, said the wildfire models make sense.

"It all sounds reasonable. I certainly believe that there were wildfires. I'm revising a paper now that reports significant amounts of soot in KT sediments [which mark the geologic boundary between the Cretaceous and Tertiary Periods] from the central north Pacific, so fires must have been very widespread."

152 posted on 06/03/2004 3:51:39 PM PDT by Alas Babylon!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies ]


To: All

bttt


153 posted on 06/03/2004 4:28:24 PM PDT by netmilsmom (The Libs prefer to silence than debate.-Political Junkie Too)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies ]

To: Alas Babylon!

Fair point, although I'd think twice about trusting a subterranean shelter, even so.

Okay, assume the shelter held up through the earthquakes, wasn't inundated with seawater, and the fires have run their course. You need air, and food and water and if underground, the energy to support a viable habitat. The requirements for food alone, for the necessary extended period would require a colossal facility. One would probably have to be planned and prepared long before detection of a threatening object.

Which brings up the question: Is there any evidence that such an undertaking is in the works?

Then again, there's no guarantee that such a shelter wouldn't be within the radius of complete destruction. The only way that I can see to assure the survival of the species is with a self-sufficient off-planet colony.

If something like this were to occur between now and the time that such a colony exists, and it were of the magnitude that we're talking about, that's probably all she wrote, folks, unless isolated, hardy survivors manage to eke out a Stone-Age existance someplace. Disasters are often quirky. I'd expect that there's be a few.


154 posted on 06/03/2004 5:00:44 PM PDT by Riley (Need an experienced computer tech in the DC Metro area? I'm looking. Freepmail for details.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson