Skip to comments.
Linux Kernel e1000 Ethernet Card Driver Buffer Overflow Vulnerability
SecurityFocus.com ^
| May 14, 2004
| SecurityFocus.com
Posted on 05/19/2004 8:47:14 PM PDT by Bush2000
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-68 next last
To: Bush2000
Facts suck sometimes. Do you get this worked up about Microsoft security holes?
21
posted on
05/19/2004 9:17:46 PM PDT
by
inflation
(Cuba = BAD, China = Good? Why, should both be treated the way Cuba is?)
To: N3WBI3
Lets see what is Microsofts time between a vulnerability announcement and a fix?
Clue phone: Availability of a patch doesn't mean all vulnerable systems are patched, you dolt.
22
posted on
05/19/2004 9:20:53 PM PDT
by
Bush2000
To: inflation
I use what tool is best for the job at hand, is that wrong in your opinion?
Toss back a few Thorazine. You're safer. Really. /SARCASM
23
posted on
05/19/2004 9:22:15 PM PDT
by
Bush2000
To: Bush2000
You ignored my post asking you if you mistoke the e1000 for the ne2000 series of cards. Why is that? And do you every answer any questions or do you just spout off like this all the time?
24
posted on
05/19/2004 9:22:24 PM PDT
by
inflation
(Cuba = BAD, China = Good? Why, should both be treated the way Cuba is?)
To: Bush2000
Are you saying that I should use Microsoft products for everything I do?
25
posted on
05/19/2004 9:22:57 PM PDT
by
inflation
(Cuba = BAD, China = Good? Why, should both be treated the way Cuba is?)
To: inflation
You ignored my post asking you if you mistoke the e1000 for the ne2000 series of cards. Why is that?
It's irrelevant.
26
posted on
05/19/2004 9:31:58 PM PDT
by
Bush2000
To: inflation
Are you saying that I should use Microsoft products for everything I do?
Choose whatever delusion you like.
27
posted on
05/19/2004 9:32:19 PM PDT
by
Bush2000
To: Bush2000
Jeez, this thread is more contentious than Arnold vs. McClintock.
28
posted on
05/19/2004 9:32:52 PM PDT
by
zencat
(http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=2478851453)
To: Bush2000
No, it isn't. It could demonstrate you lack of knowledge on the subjects that you say you know a lot about.
It's a common mistake those in marketing make.
29
posted on
05/19/2004 9:33:03 PM PDT
by
inflation
(Cuba = BAD, China = Good? Why, should both be treated the way Cuba is?)
To: Bush2000
Do you every answer questions directed at you or do you always respond like a smart ---?
30
posted on
05/19/2004 9:33:58 PM PDT
by
inflation
(Cuba = BAD, China = Good? Why, should both be treated the way Cuba is?)
To: Bush2000
Lets see the other recent VUlnerabilities from security focus 5-14 to 5-17
Microsoft UPnP NOTIFY Buffer Overflow Vulnerability
Microsoft Internet Explorer http-equiv Meta Tag Denial of Service Vulnerability
Microsoft Internet Explorer Codebase Double Backslash Local Zone File Execution Weakness
Microsoft Internet Explorer Interface Spoofing Vulnerability
Microsoft Windows LSASS Buffer Overrun Vulnerability
Now in addition to the Linux post you put up we have
Linux IPRoute Spoofed Kernel Messages Denial Of Service Vulnerability
Linux Kernel SCTP_SetSockOpt Integer Overflow Vulnerability
31
posted on
05/19/2004 9:34:29 PM PDT
by
N3WBI3
To: zencat
;->
It's kind of like fighting with the output of DU piped thru a marketing filter. :->
32
posted on
05/19/2004 9:34:52 PM PDT
by
inflation
(Cuba = BAD, China = Good? Why, should both be treated the way Cuba is?)
To: Bush2000
No kidding?? really in millions of lines of code there are going to be bugs really?? wow!
Its called code review, the error was found, and fixed by the same guy. Will there be other bugs in the kernel, I would bet money on it.
Is it a *more* secure OS, ya sure you betcha... The code review is far better for hte Linux Kernel than the windows Kernel..
33
posted on
05/19/2004 9:40:10 PM PDT
by
N3WBI3
To: N3WBI3
Typical change-the-subject-behavior. /SARCASM
34
posted on
05/19/2004 9:40:26 PM PDT
by
Bush2000
To: N3WBI3
Is it a *more* secure OS, ya sure you betcha...
Of course it is. You think. /SARCASM
The code review is far better for hte Linux Kernel than the windows Kernel..
You'd know. After all, you were present for neither. /SARCASM
35
posted on
05/19/2004 9:41:56 PM PDT
by
Bush2000
To: Bush2000
Yea because its not like the Linux Kernel before and after is available, and easily diffed in CVS that would make it too ease /sarcasm..
36
posted on
05/19/2004 9:43:15 PM PDT
by
N3WBI3
To: Bush2000
So your sarcasm tag would indicate you dont think I am trying to change the subject? Wow slow down a bit man...
You point out a vulnerability in the Kernel I point out two more and five windows vulnerabilities and somehow I changed the subject??
37
posted on
05/19/2004 9:45:23 PM PDT
by
N3WBI3
To: N3WBI3
Yea because its not like the Linux Kernel before and after is available, and easily diffed in CVS that would make it too ease /sarcasm..
Well, since CVS can be hacked, it wouldn't be wise to depend on any of its CRCs...
Flaws drill holes in open-source repository
Not a good day for OSS bigots.
38
posted on
05/19/2004 9:47:28 PM PDT
by
Bush2000
To: N3WBI3
You point out a vulnerability in the Kernel I point out two more and five windows vulnerabilities and somehow I changed the subject??
Since, at last glance, Microsoft doesn't suffer from this E1000 flaw ... yeah, you are changing the subject... /SARCASM
39
posted on
05/19/2004 9:48:20 PM PDT
by
Bush2000
To: Bush2000
The only biggot on this thread is you, I am content to use windows and Linux, OSS and Closed source... Just because you ignore the problems of your fan boy os does not mean I do..
So let me ask you do have to be a chicom to see the windows kernel?
40
posted on
05/19/2004 9:49:45 PM PDT
by
N3WBI3
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-68 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson