Americas leading lights, including those in government responsible for dealing with terrorism and with Iraq, made a mammoth blunder. They failed to recognize that starting with the first assault on New Yorks World Trade Center, Iraq was working with Islamic militants to attack the United States. This failure left the country vulnerable on September 11, 2001. Many of those who made this professional error cannot bring themselves to acknowledge it; perhaps, they cannot even recognize it. They mock whomever presents information tying Iraq to the 9/11 attacks; discredit that information; and assert there is no evidence. What they do not do is discuss in a rational way the significance of the information that is presented. I myself have experienced this many times, including in testimony before the 9/11 Commission, when as I responded to a Commissioners question, a fellow panelist repeatedly interrupted, screeching That is not evidence, even as C-SPAN broadcast the event to the entire country.
Let's see, who on that panel would 1)screech and 2) have the most to lose when proof comes to light that Saddam was involved with WTC '93 and 9/11?
Who could it be... who could it be?