Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: DannyTN
Evidence of Mammals existing with Dinosaurs.

??? You think clams are mammals???

And what did you think of the time frame of the catastrophe?

Now, what was your point?

6 posted on 04/06/2004 1:53:20 PM PDT by balrog666 (A public service post.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: balrog666
"??? You think clams are mammals???"

No, there was clams and mammal fossils there. " Sedimentary evidence indicating bone transport means that we see the dinosaur burial site today, not the “park” in which they lived. Mammals are not depicted in “The Age of Reptiles” icon, but mammal fossils are well represented in the Morrison Formation at DNM.7 "

"And what did you think of the time frame of the catastrophe?"

I didn't see where it concluded a time frame, I was dissappointed that the article did not provide specific evidence for a short time frame. It did say this though. "Finally, the age for the deposit has been “adjusted” so many times over the last 80 years that there is little reason for confidence that the currently accepted age is the correct one.8 "

Now, what was your point?

That a global flood fits better with the evidence than localized river flooding. And that the so-called scientific community are often grossly wrong in their assumptions and conclusions because their world view / religion influences their science.

7 posted on 04/06/2004 2:02:28 PM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson