[Ramius]

There were no dogs present that I recall, shaggy or otherwise. :-)

Enormous quanties of alcohol may not be a legal excuse for laws bent or broken... but it *is* a plausible explanation for same.

By way of explanation... there are whole *months* of the year 1982 that I don't really have recall. There are really just frames of moments. Some or most of which are not suitable for mixed company. :-)

[Wneighbor]

Enormous quanties of alcohol may not be a legal excuse for laws bent or broken... but it *is* a plausible explanation for same. By way of explanation... there are whole *months* of the year 1982 that I don't really have recall. There are really just frames of moments. Some or most of which are not suitable for mixed company. :-)

What laws honey?

[Wneighbor]

oops, I was gonna insert the popcorn gif with that!

[Rose in RoseBear]

No shaggy dogs?

<snapping fingers> Durn it!

Were there any furry guys there? That would more than make up for the lack of shaggy dogs ...!

[Rose in RoseBear]

By way of explanation... there are whole *months* of the year 1982 that I don't really have recall. There are really just frames of moments. Some or most of which are not suitable for mixed company. :-)

<staring at you with wide-eyed fascination and a wider grin>

Tagging those moments as "not suitable for mixed company" is just like introducing a cat to a catnip patch.

You know that, Master Sea-man.

And now I understand how you attract the chickie-poos at bars! What a fascinating strategy!