Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: eleni121
By "innocent Germans", I meant that a showing of Schindler's List today could cause a backlash on Germans who weren't even alive during the Holocaust.

The "backlash against Jews" argument is being used by the ADL as a reason not to show The Passion. Is this a valid argument by the ADL?

80 posted on 02/16/2004 9:44:17 AM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]


To: robertpaulsen
By "innocent Germans", I meant that a showing of Schindler's List today could cause a backlash on Germans who weren't even alive during the Holocaust.

Has that ever happened?

The "backlash against Jews" argument is being used by the ADL as a reason not to show The Passion. Is this a valid argument by the ADL?

Have they actually said, "don't show it"? Or have they said, "modify it"? I guess it doesn't really matter - it amounts to the same thing - censorship of something that's truly a Christian matter. And I'm of the opinion that the ADL in general should keep it's mouth shut.

But I wonder why so many on this thread don't adopt a "more Christian" attitude towards the ADL? A type of "we understand what you're saying...you have a right to be concerned....is there something we could do to allay your fears but still maintain what we believe to be a historical truth?"

I don't see that attitude either on the part of Gibson or his supporters. What I do see is a more "us against them" attitude (and it's not entirely unjustified). But is it Christian?

87 posted on 02/16/2004 9:56:56 AM PST by h.a. cherev
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson