Replies

It's a beautiful thing, when lying leftists are fully exposed. While the writing and logic is about 6th grade level (let's not impugn the character of grade schoolers, though) she is of course deadly serious.

Frankly, this non-movie goer finds it curious that a movie that hasn't even been released yet can garner a full page of philosophical masturbation, when hollywood and the arts in general has no qualms about denigrating religious worship.

So let me get this straight. It's OK to show major religious figures as criminally insane or worse. Our own domestic media has endless, mindless television programming that is highly biased against traditional moralities and obviously pushes a leftist social agenda. Taxpayer funding was controversially used when one brilliant artist immersed a crucifix in a glass of urine. How is it wrong, then, when a moviemaker decides to cast historical figures accurately as is possible, that this is now a problem. Further, what about the much vaunted issues of 1st amendment rights, cinematic license, and the simple fact the bastards can just choose to not see the movie? Hollywood has been poisoning the minds of viewers for generations now, why is this suddenly now a problem?